Rajkarnikar v. US Attorney's Office
| Nirjala Rajkarnikar |
| US Attorney's Office, David Azia, US Attorneys and U.S. Attorney General(s) |
| 3:2024cv00446 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Robert M Spector |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Azia, US Attorneys, filed by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector for a ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and review of the #5 amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/27/2024. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/26/2024. (Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend (Responses due by 4/15/2024), MOTION to Reopen, MOTION to Apply Application for RICO Laws by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Azia, U.S. Attorney General(s), filed by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Azia, US Attorneys, filed by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 9
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/22/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/22/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/21/2024 Discovery due by 9/21/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 10/26/2024 Signed by Clerk on 3/22/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 03/22/2024. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 Ex Parte Motion: COMPLAINT against US Attorney's Office, filed by Nirjala Rajkarnikar. (Peterson, M) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
