Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Biden et al
| Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America |
| Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, United States Secret Service, The White House, Chief of Staff and Merrick Garland |
| 3:2024cv00671 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Omar A Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/9/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Presidential Candidate Number P60005535. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Chief of Staff, Merrick Garland, The White House, United States Secret Service, filed by Presidential Candidate Number P60005535. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(Chartier, A.) |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
