Pascale et al v. Scheier
| Charles Pascale and Jessica Pascale |
| Donald Scheier |
| 3:2024cv00859 |
| May 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Imbriani, S) |
Filing 11
ORDER RE: #9 Motion to Withdraw; #10 Motion to Withdraw. These motions are construed as Notices of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/26/2024. (Haider, S)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw by Jessica Pascale. (Westcott, William) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw by Charles Pascale. (Westcott, William) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Donald Scheier* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William B. Westcott* *Maya Murphy, P.C.* *266 Post Road East* *Westport, CT 06880*. (Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Standing Protective Order, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Charles Pascale Signed by Clerk on 5/14/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Imbriani, S) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/13/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/13/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/12/2024, Discovery due by 11/12/2024, Dispositive Motions due by 12/17/2024. Signed by Clerk on 5/13/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/13/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donald Scheier ( Filing fee $405 receipt number BCTDC-7759082.), filed by Charles Pascale, Jessica Pascale.(Westcott, William) Modified on 5/13/2024 to correct parties (Maturo, F.). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Westcott, William) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
