Maertz v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
Nancy Maertz |
Paramount Global, Alfa Laval, Inc., Elliott Company, Foster Wheeler, LLC, General Electric Company, ViacomCBS Inc., CBS Corporation, Viacom Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Redco Corporation |
3:2024cv00860 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarala V Nagala |
Robert A Richardson |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/13/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement by Alfa Laval, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Alfa Laval Inc. AB for Alfa Laval, Inc.. (Hadfield, Kevin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Alfa Laval, Inc. (Notice of Pending Motions) (Hadfield, Kevin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Alfa Laval, Inc. from J.D. of Fairfield at Bridgeport, case number FBT-CV24-6133173-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7759444, filed by Alfa Laval, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Hadfield, Kevin) |
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.