White v. Nixon Uniform Services, Inc.
| Kasean White |
| Nixon Uniform Services, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00868 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nixon Uniform Services, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *James V. Sabatini* *Sabatini & Associates* *One Market Square* *Newington, CT 06111*. (Barry, L.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Kasean White, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Standing Protective Order, #6 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 5/14/2024.(Barry, L.) |
| Filing 6 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 5/14/2024. (Attachments: #1 Identification of Initial Discovery Protocol for Employment Cases)(Barry, L.) |
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/14/2024.(Barry, L.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/14/2024.(Barry, L.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/13/2024 Discovery due by 11/13/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 12/18/2024 Signed by Clerk on 5/14/2024.(Barry, L.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/14/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nixon Uniform Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7761285.), filed by Kasean White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabatini, James) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Nixon Uniform Services, Inc.. (Sabatini, James) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. Nixon Uniform Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kasean White | |
| Represented By: | James V. Sabatini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nixon Uniform Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
