Ornstein v. Wieczorek
Athena Ornstein |
Corey Wieczorek |
Corey Wieczorek |
Robert Mehl |
3:2024cv01182 |
July 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Maria E Garcia |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 THIRD-PARTY ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Robert Mehl* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas L. Tisdale* *Tisdale & Nast Law Offices, LLC* *10 Spruce Street* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 14 ***Entered in Error*** ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Robert Mehl* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas L. Tisdale* *Tisdale & Nast Law Offices, LLC* *10 Spruce Street* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Fanelle, N.) Modified on 8/26/2024, incorrect form. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 13 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Robert Mehl, filed by Corey Wieczorek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Tisdale, Thomas) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Corey Wieczorek.(Tisdale, Thomas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas L. Tisdale on behalf of Corey Wieczorek (Tisdale, Thomas) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Robert Mehl. (Tisdale, Thomas) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement by Athena Ornstein. (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Athena Ornstein. Corey Wieczorek served on 7/22/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Corey Wieczorek* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kenneth Wynne Bohonnon* *Bohonnon Law Firm* *195 Church St., 8th Floor* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Imbriani, S) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Athena Ornstein, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 7/12/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Imbriani, S) (Imbriani, S). |
Filing 5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 7/11/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 7/11/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/9/2024; Discovery due by 1/10/2025; Dispositive Motions due by 2/14/2025. Signed by Clerk on 7/11/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/11/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corey Wieczorek ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7830295.), filed by Athena Ornstein.(Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Corey Wieczorek. (Bohonnon, Kenneth) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.