Carter v. 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC
Jessica Carter |
35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC doing business as Skyview Center |
3:2024cv01339 |
August 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
S Dave Vatti |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jeffrey S. Morneau* *Connor & Morneau, LLP* *273 State Street, Ste #2* *Springfield, MA 01103*. (Chartier, A.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #1 Complaint, filed by Jessica Carter, #5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Chartier, A.) |
Filing 5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/21/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/21/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/20/2024 Discovery due by 2/20/2025 Dispositive Motions due by 3/27/2025 Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7876531.), filed by Jessica Carter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Sue, #3 Exhibit Summons for 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC)(Morneau, Jeffrey) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC. (Maturo, F.) |
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carter v. 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 35 Marc Drive Operations, LLC doing business as Skyview Center | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jessica Carter | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey S. Morneau |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.