Guzman v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Josefina Guzman |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2024cv01659 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.Responses due by 1/2/2025 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Declaration)(Fernandez, Sixtina) |
Filing 13
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 11/4/2024. (Santos, S)
|
| Filing 12 Consent and Transfer to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 10/31/2024.(Nuzzi, T) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sixtina Fernandez appearing for Commissioner of Social Security, bar number (Paperless filing) (Fernandez, Sixtina) |
| Filing 10 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Josefina Guzman (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Konoski on behalf of Josefina Guzman (Konoski, Bryan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Attorney Bryan Konoski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. Signed by Clerk on 10/18/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 10/18/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 10/18/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 10/18/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing Order regarding Assignment of Appeals of Social Security Administration Decisions. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 10/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Bryan Konoski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7940250) by Josefina Guzman. (Jones, Jullian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7940158.), filed by Josefina Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Jullian) |
| Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to 12/18/2024. (Chartier, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
