Davis v. Thomas et al
| Alice Davis |
| Stevens Transport, Inc. and Akeil Thomas |
| 3:2024cv01693 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
GENERAL SCHEDULING ORDER. The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #17 ) is hereby APPROVED as modified by this order. All discovery shall be completed by November 28, 2025, and all other interim discovery dates set forth in the parties' Rule 26(f) Report are hereby adopted. Any dispositive summary judgment motions shall be filed by October 9, 2025, and any response to dispositive summary judgment motions shall be filed by November 10, 2025. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by December 9, 2025, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive summary judgment motions, whichever date is later. The Court will thereafter set a trial date, and the parties should be prepared to proceed to jury selection within 60 days of the filing of the joint trial memorandum. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum" and "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences." The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/8/2024.(Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 19 Supplemental AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Akeil Thomas on 9/26/2024, filed by Alice Davis. (Dufour, Chrysten) |
| Filing 18 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Alice Davis. (Dufour, Chrysten) |
| Filing 17 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Schaeffer, Emiko) |
| Filing 16 Supplemental AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Stevens Transport Inc. on 10/16/2024, filed by Alice Davis. (Dufour, Chrysten) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Chrysten Anne Dufour on behalf of Alice Davis (Dufour, Chrysten) |
| Filing 14 Docket Entry Correction re #12 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal). Redocketed as a text searchable document. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Emiko Schaeffer on behalf of Thomas Akeil and Stevens Transport, Inc. (Schaeffer, Emiko) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Thomas Akeil, Stevens Transport, Inc..(Tripicco, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2024: #1 Replacement PDF) (Chartier, A.). Modified on 10/29/2024 to add Replacement PDF as document filed was not text searchable. (Chartier, A.). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil, #4 Disclosure Statement filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #8 Electronic Filing Order, 6 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil, #9 Standing Protective Order, #5 Notice (Other) filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil, #10 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Chartier, A.) |
|
Filing 9
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/23/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/23/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/22/2024 Discovery due by 4/24/2025 Dispositive Motions due by 5/29/2025 Signed by Clerk on 10/23/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 6 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/23/2024.(Perez, J.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Thomas Akeil, Stevens Transport, Inc. Statement Filed Pursuant to Standing Order in Removed Cases (Tripicco, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by Thomas Akeil, Stevens Transport, Inc.. (Tripicco, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Thomas Akeil, Stevens Transport, Inc. of No Pending Motions (Tripicco, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Scott Tripicco on behalf of Thomas Akeil, Stevens Transport, Inc. (Tripicco, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil from Bridgeport Superior Court, case number FBT-CV24-6139146-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7944845, filed by Stevens Transport, Inc., Thomas Akeil.(Tripicco, Michael) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
