Vuksanovich et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
Plaintiff: Kristi Vuksanovich and Mark Vuksanovich
Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corporation and JetBlue Airways Corp
Case Number: 3:2024mc00015
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Robert N Chatigny
Referring Judge: S Dave Vatti
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying as moot #1 Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance in light of Ecf No. 6. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/28/2024. (Rickevicius, L.)
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Approved. So ORDERED re #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Mark Vuksanovich, Kristi Vuksanovich. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/28/2024. (Rickevicius, L.)
February 28, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by All Plaintiffs (O'Neill, Ryan)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. A telephonic status conference is set for 2/28/2024 at 1:00 p.m. before Judge S. Dave Vatti. To connect to the conference, parties shall dial 866-434-5269 and enter access code 2006808. (Ellis, Bernadette)
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti for a ruling on #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance Per F.R.C.P. 45 and for Contempt Sanctions. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2-13-2024. (Shafer, J.)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2-9-2024. (Shafer, J.)
February 9, 2024 Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Freberg, B)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $52 fee; receipt number ACTDC-7644019), filed by Kristi Vuksanovich, Mark Vuksanovich.Responses due by 3/1/2024 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 1-5 to Memorandum in Support, #3 Certificate of Service)(O'Neill, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vuksanovich et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristi Vuksanovich
Represented By: Ryan A O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Vuksanovich
Represented By: Ryan A O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JetBlue Airways Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?