Cuevas-Lopez v. Wallace
| Angel Cuevas-Lopez |
| Nicholas Alexander Wallace |
| 3:2025cv01304 |
| August 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Nicholas Alexander Wallace waiver sent on 10/8/2025, answer due 12/8/2025 filed by Angel Cuevas-Lopez. (Taubes, Alexander) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Angel Cuevas-Lopez, #5 Electronic Filing Order, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Standing Protective Order, #7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Angel Cuevas-Lopez Signed by Clerk on 8/18/2025.(Freberg, B) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 6
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/14/2025.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 8/14/2025.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/14/2025 Discovery due by 2/13/2026 Dispositive Motions due by 3/20/2026 Signed by Clerk on 8/14/2025.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/14/25.(Hushin, Z.) |
| CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Victor A. Bolden assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. (Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Angel Cuevas-Lopez. (Taubes, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nicholas Alexander Wallace ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8279086.), filed by Angel Cuevas-Lopez.(Taubes, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cuevas-Lopez v. Wallace | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angel Cuevas-Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Alexander T. Taubes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nicholas Alexander Wallace | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
