Jones v. Hood et al
| Ashley Jones |
| Tara Hood, Trina Sexton, Warden V, Suess and Kamal |
| 3:2025cv01607 |
| September 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Consent to Electronic Notice by Ashley Jones (Freberg, B) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 11/19/2025. (Corriette, M.)
|
| Filing 14 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ashley Jones. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashley Jones. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ashley Jones, Cleared PRISSCAN Flag (Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, she seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits her to do so if, among other things, she submits a financial affidavit showing that she is unable to pay, accompanied by a certified copy of her inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding her complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application. In this case, the plaintiff submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. She also did not submit a certified copy of her inmate trust account statement for the last six months. Her application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at her address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court along with a certified copy of her inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from March 24, 2025 to September 24, 2025. If she does not do so by November 24, 2025, her case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 11/3/25.(Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ashley Jones. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashley Jones. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 9/24/2025.(Freberg, B) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/24/2025.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Chief Judge on 6/22/2016.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/24/2025.(Freberg, B)
|
| CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Victor A. Bolden assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia. (Sichanh, C) |
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/24/2025.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Complaint which has been assigned case number 25-1607. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 10/24/2025 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 10/24/2025. Signed by Clerk on 9/24/2025.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tara Hood, Kamal, Trina Sexton, Suess, Warden V, filed by Ashley Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Gaskins, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
