In re: Heather L. Perreault
| Heather L. Perreault |
| Federal Grievance Committee |
| 3:2025gp00012 |
| August 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Reciprocal Discipline |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order of Discipline placing Attorney Heather L. Perreault in inactive status. The respondent shall comply with Local Rule 83.2(i) for reinstatement. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/1/25 (Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Default and Imposition of Reciprocal Discipline. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/1/25. (Pesta, J.)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Default and Imposition of Reciprocal Discipline by Federal Grievance Committee. (Pesta, J.) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). |
| Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #3 Presentment for Discipline, certified return receipt # 9589 0710 5270 2127 0320 91. Show Cause Hearing set for 12/22/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom Two, 141 Church St., New Haven, CT before Judge Victor A. Bolden, Show Cause Response due by 11/21/2025 (Pesta, J.) (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Notice of Reciprocal Discipline, #2 Copy of State Court Order, #3 Presentment for Discipline mailed to Heather L. Perreault The Law Firm of Lockaby and Perreault, LLC, 7 West Street, P.O. Box 1561, Litchfield, CT 06759 via certified return receipt # 7014 0510 0000 3049 6297. Show Cause Hearing set for 11/12/2025 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom One, 141 Church St., New Haven, CT before Judge Victor A. Bolden. Show Cause Response due by 10/10/2025 (Corriette, M.) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.).
|
| Filing 3 Presentment for Discipline re #1 Notice of Reciprocal Discipline filed by Federal Grievance Committee (Pesta, J.) (Main Document 3 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). |
| Filing 2 Copy of State Court Order approving Stipulation Placing Respondent in Inactive Status(Pesta, J.) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). |
| Filing 1 Notice of Reciprocal Discipline received from Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury at Waterbury re: Interim Suspension (Corriette, M.) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/1/2025) (Pesta, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re: Heather L. Perreault | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Participant: Federal Grievance Committee | |
| Represented By: | Sean M. Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Heather L. Perreault | |
| Represented By: | Heather L. Perreault |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
