Klaneski v. Simm Associates Inc
| Rosa Lee Klaneski |
| Simm Associates Inc |
| 3:2026cv00523 |
| April 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, in light of the stipulation of dismissal filed at ECF No. 18. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/4/2026.(sd)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Simm Associates Inc. (Pitcher, Stacey) |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Bozek, Michael) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER. The parties have reported that this action has settled in principle. Rather than continue to keep the case open on the docket, the Clerk is directed to administratively close the file immediately, without prejudice to reopening by any party on or before June 8, 2026. If the parties wish to file a stipulation of dismissal, they may do so on or before June 8, 2026. The dates set forth in this order may be extended for good cause, upon a motion filed in accordance with Local Rule 7(b). Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/11/2026. (Glover, S)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement by Simm Associates Inc (Pitcher, Stacey) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting ECF No. #14 Motion to Withdraw Motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the motion filed at ECF No. 13 as withdrawn. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/7/2026. (Glover, S)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Remand by Rosa Lee Klaneski. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Sichanh, C) |
| Filing 13 WITHDRAWN - MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rosa Lee Klaneski. Responses due by 5/19/2026 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Irizarry, Josie) Modified on 5/8/2026. See ECF 15 (Kelsey, N). |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Simm Associates Inc.(Pitcher, Stacey) |
| Answer deadline updated for Simm Associates Inc to 4/13/2026. (Denault, S) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within seven days of removal, by April 13, 2026. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2)(C). Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/9/2026. (Glover, S)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Simm Associates Inc, 9 Notice re: AI-Assisted Research,,,, #7 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 5 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, Signed by Clerk on 4/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 removal standing order)(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 4/6/2026.(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/6/2026.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/5/2026 Discovery due by 10/6/2026 Dispositive Motions due by 11/10/2026 Signed by Clerk on 4/6/2026.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 5 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/6/2026.(Murphy, T) |
| CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Sarala V. Nagala assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Simm Associates Inc of Compliance with Standing Order on Removed Cases (Pitcher, Stacey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Simm Associates Inc of Pending Motions (Pitcher, Stacey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stacey L. Pitcher on behalf of Simm Associates Inc (Pitcher, Stacey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Simm Associates Inc from Connecticut Superior Court, case number HHB-CV-26-6104130-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-8563532, filed by Simm Associates Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Pitcher, Stacey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Klaneski v. Simm Associates Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosa Lee Klaneski | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Simm Associates Inc | |
| Represented By: | Stacey L. Pitcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
