Gartner Inc. et al v. Virk et al
| Gartner Inc. and Gartner Holdings, LLC |
| Anmol Virk, Tyler Rudolph and International Data Corporation, Inc. |
| 3:2026cv01450 |
| September 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily McDonough Souza on behalf of Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc. (Souza, Emily) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 6 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc., #9 Standing Protective Order, 10 Notice re: AI-Assisted Research, #3 Disclosure Statement filed by Gartner Holdings, LLC, #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Gartner Inc., #8 Electronic Filing Order, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Complaint filed by Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc., #1 Notice of Appearance filed by Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc., #11 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Signed by Clerk on 9/08/2026. (ll) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment.(ll) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 9/08/2026.(ll) |
Filing 9
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/08/2026.(ll)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/08/2026.(ll)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/9/2026, Discovery due by 3/10/2027, Dispositive Motions due by 4/14/2027. Signed by Clerk on 9/08/2026. (ll)
|
| Filing 6 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/8/2026.(tm) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against International Data Corporation, Inc., Tyler Rudolph, Anmol Virk, filed by Gartner Inc., Gartner Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support for Temporary Restraining Order)(Schwartz, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by Gartner Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Gartner, Inc., Corporate Parent Baron Capital Management, Inc. for Gartner Holdings, LLC. (Schwartz, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Gartner Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Baron Capital Management, Inc. for Gartner Inc.. (Schwartz, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Adam Schwartz on behalf of Gartner Holdings, LLC, Gartner Inc. (Schwartz, Daniel) |
| Filing fee received from Daniel A Schwartz: $ 405.00, receipt number Pay.gov 285PV7BB(jp) |
| CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Kari A. Dooley assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. (to) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
