U.S.A. v. Donovan

Case Number: 1:1996cv00484
Filed: October 2, 1996
Court: Delaware District Court
Office: Environmental Matters Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
Referring Judge: Mary Pat Thynge
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 33:1319 Clean Water Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 10, 2010 151 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 146 Report and Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge, GRANTING 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by USA, AND DENYING 137 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by David H. Donovan. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/10/2010. (rpg)
July 23, 2010 146 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by USA be GRANTED. Re: 137 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by David H. Donovan be DENIED. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil P rocedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2010. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/23/2010. (cak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S.A. v. Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?