Dickens v. Taylor, et al
1:2004cv00201 |
April 1, 2004 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. |
Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 306 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 302 STATEMENT of Damages Against First Correctional Medical filed by Kevin L. Dickens. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/16/2015. (rpg) |
Filing 279 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 271 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Plaintiff's Request for Injunctive Relief filed by Tyson, Belanger, Gardels, Cunningham, Evans, Harvey, Rainey, Burton. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/24/13. (ntl) |
Filing 252 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting defendant Carroll and defendant Oney's request to be dismissed due to qualified immunity; each side shall be allocated a maximum of seventeen (17) hours in which to present their case at trial. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/10/13. (ntl) |
Filing 244 MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding pretrial issues (See Order for further details). Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/5/13. (ntl) |
Filing 242 MEMORANDUM ORDER re remaining defendants and claims. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/4/13. (ntl) |
Filing 241 MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding rulings on the pretrial issues before the Court (See Order for further details). Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/3/13. (ntl) |
Filing 183 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 171 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/14/11. (ntl) |
Filing 170 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 140 MOTION for Extension of Time to Effect Service of Process Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff will re-issue new USM-285 forms for certain Defendants. Following such service Defendants will be allowed 60 days for discovery, and may seek an extension of time to file summary judgment motions. Further the Pre-Trial Conference set for 12/10/2009 is CANCELED. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 12/3/2009. (nms) |
Filing 167 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Motions for Summary Judgment found at D.I. 144 and 149 . Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 11/24/2009. (nms) |
Filing 134 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 127 MOTION to (I) Enforce the Memorandum Order Dated February 20, 2009; (II) to Compel Production of Defendants Burris, Cunningham, Drake, and Belanger for Deposition; and (III) Amend Scheduling Order. Setting Deadlines/Hearings (Discovery due by 7/17/2009., Dispositive Motions due by 9/18/2009., Pretrial Conference set for 12/10/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 5/29/2009. (nms) |
Filing 126 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 122 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery, to Amend the Scheduling Order, for a Protective Order, and to Stay the scheduled depositions filed by Kevin L. Dickens. The Motion will be resolved as follows: DENIED with regard to Exceeding the Deposition limit; GRANTING the Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order; and GRANTING the Protective Order and/or Stay the Scheduled Depositions to the extent that the presently scheduled depositions shall be rescheduled. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 2/20/2009. (nms) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dickens v. Taylor, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.