Sepracor Inc. v. Dey LP et al
| 1:2006cv00113 |
| February 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Mary Pat Thynge |
| Vacant Judgeship |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
538
MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in Part, Denying in Part 516 MOTION for Reconsideration; Granting in Part, Denying in Part Sunovion's request for a jury instruction regarding the FDA letters. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/27/12. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
523
MEMORANDUM OPINION re issue of incorporation by reference. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/18/12. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
410
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 394 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended and Supplemental Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 7/15/2010. (nms)
|
|
Filing
392
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 364 and 361 Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 9/24/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
391
MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 347 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Sepracor Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 9/15/2009. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sepracor Inc. v. Dey LP et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
