Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com Inc.
Case Number: 1:2006cv00491
Filed: August 8, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
Presiding Judge: Mary Pat Thynge
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 616 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 4/11/2012. (cak)
July 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 592 MEMORANDUM OPINION Cordance's motion for permanent injunction or, in the alternative, imposition of an ongoing royalty will be denied. In light of that decision, Amazon's motion to strike the declaration of Dr. Michael Shamos in support of Cordance's motion for permanent injunction will be dismissed as moot. An appropriate order consistent with this memorandum will follow. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/23/2010. (cak)
March 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 530 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER For the reasons contained herein, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Cordances motion for leave to file a reply in support of its proposed schedule for resolution of outstanding issues, D.I. 522, is GRANTED; 2. The courts order on bifurcat ion of damages will remain in effect, and Cordances request for a jury trial on damages is presently denied; 3. A two-day bench trial on Amazon's equitable defenses will be scheduled at the convenience of the court; and 4. A teleconference is scheduled for Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. (EST) to be initiated by Cordance, for the purpose of scheduling the two-day hearing on Amazons equitable defenses, setting a briefing schedule regarding those defenses,and setting a briefing schedule for Cordance's request for equitable relief. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 3/19/2010. (cak)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 514 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons contained herein, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Cordances Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial 502 is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and DISMISSED AS MOOT IN PART. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 2/22/2010. (cak)
July 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 441 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Patent Misuse and Certification of Correction 419 and 420 . Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 8/28/2009. (cak)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 437 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons contained herein, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 1. Amazons motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and no willful infringement 314 is granted in part and denied in part: A. Amazons motion fo r summary judgment of non-infringement is DENIED. B. Amazons motion for summary judgment of no willful infringement is GRANTED. 2. Amazons motion for summary judgment re lack of written description for U.S. Patent 6,757,710 B2 316 is DENIED. 3. Cor dances motion to strike materials produced after the close of discovery and inadmissible hearsay 339 is granted in part, denied in part, and moot in part. Cordances motion to strike the Kaphan testimony is GRANTED. The remainder of Cordances motio n to strike is DENIED or MOOT as discussed above. 4. Amazons motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 6,757,710 B2 318 is DENIED. 5. Cordances motion for leave to file sur-reply in opposition to Amazon's motion for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 6,757,710 380 is MOOT. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/27/2009. (cak)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 418 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In light of the findings herein and during the pretrial conference, Amazons motion to strike (D.I. 367) is MOOT. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 6/30/2009. (cak)
February 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 335 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Amazons motion for leave to amend 286 specifically paragraphs 11 through 28 and 30 through 40 is GRANTED. Paragraph 29, captioned Other Prior Art, fails to meet the requirements of Rule 8(a) and does not come close to pleading with particularity under Rule 9(b). Therefore, Amazons motion to amend to include paragraph 29 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that although Amazons motion to amend has been granted, it does not mean that inequitable conduct will be tried with th e rest of the issues in the case, and the court will consider how to accommodate the inequitable conduct claims in the current pretrial management order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic status conference will be conducted on Monday, March 2, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss proposed changes to the scheduling order. Amazons counsel shall initiate the call. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 2/18/2009. (cak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?