Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC et al
| 1:2006cv00557 |
| September 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
390
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/20/2012. (fms)
|
|
Filing
329
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 327 MOTION for Reargument re 326 Memorandum and Order HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.'S MOTION FOR REARGUMENT AND RECONSIDERATION, denying 322 SEALED MOTION for Reargument re 299 Memorandum Opinion Honeywe ll International Inc.'s Motion for Reargument or Clarification (w/Exhibits A-B), granting 317 SEALED MOTION for Leave to Serve an Expert Witness Statement on the Disclosure of the Russian Patent. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 9/13/2011. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
326
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Honeywell is precluded from offering evidence of the '706 patent and the 1997 Solvay Memorandum at trial. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 9/8/2011. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
299
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/26/2011. (nmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
