Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Seiren Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Defendant: Seiren Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00104
Filed: February 22, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Vacant Judgeship
Presiding Judge: Mary Pat Thynge
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 73 motion for attorney's fees and expenses. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 3/31/09. (ntl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Seiren Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Represented By: Francis DiGiovanni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seiren Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Leslie A. Polizoti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?