Abraham v. State of Delaware Department of Corrections et al
| Abraham R. Abraham |
| State of Delaware Department of Corrections, Civigenics Inc., Laura Sikora, Aaron Prince, Correctional Medical Services, Bell, Lt. Costello, Mann and Warden of S.U.O.P. |
| 1:2007cv00593 |
| September 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Kent |
| Leonard P. Stark |
| Vacant Judgeship |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM ORDER finding that plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies. ORDER Setting Teleconference: plaintiff to initiate the call.( A Telephone Conference is set for 11/21/2013 at 05:00 PM before Judge Sue L. Robinson). See memorandum order for further details. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 11/6/2013. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/17/2012. (fms)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/11/2010. (lid)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 84 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Kenneth R. Abraham, denying 87 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Kenneth R. Abraham. SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/2010., Answering Brief due 5/3/2010., Reply Brief due 5/17/2010.). Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 10/27/2009. (lid)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 1/22/2009. (nmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
