Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Allergan Inc.
Defendant: Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp. and Apotex Pharmachem India PVT Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00779
Filed: November 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Presiding Judge: Vacant Judgeship
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 150 OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 12/20/2011. (nmf)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM ORDER dismissing without prejudice to renew 126 MOTION for New Trial or, Alternatively, to Amend Judgment and Findings Regarding Claim 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the record of this litigation is opened pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a)(2) so that the parties may present additional testimony with respect to the following specific questions regarding the validity of claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 6,333,045 (the 045 patent). Order Setting Teleconference:( Telephone Conference set for 11/29/2010 03:00 PM before Judge Sue L. Robinson.). Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 11/3/2010. (nmf)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM ORDER re: claim construction. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/14/2010. (nmf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Represented By: Maryellen Noreika
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
Represented By: Maryellen Noreika
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allergan Inc.
Represented By: Maryellen Noreika
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Pharmachem India PVT Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?