Subh v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
| Majed Subh |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Ruth McPherson |
| 1:2008cv00410 |
| July 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| New Castle |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM ORDER accepting 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT ON ALL CLAIMS 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled. ORDER granting 42 Motion for Glenn A. Brown, Esquire and Frank Conley, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/31/2010. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT ON ALL CLAIMS re 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Proposed Order and Certificate of Service filed by Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Ruth McPherson. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Ru le of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2009. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/19/2009. (rpg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
