Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Apeldyn Corporation
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00568
Filed: September 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 714 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 687 Motion for Protective Order; adopting Report and Recommendations re 709 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/20/2012. (fms)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 695 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying without prejudice 675 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Defendants Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation's and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc.'s Motion for Fees Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285) filed by Chi M ei Optoelectronics USA Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, denying without prejudice 677 Motion for Joinder in Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation's Motion for Fees under 35 USC §285 filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/3/2012. (fms)
December 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 655 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER re claim construction re: 626 Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 12/19/2011. (nmf)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 627 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 11/15/2011. (nmf)
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 254 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/12/2010. (lid)
September 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 155 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 9/30/2009. (nmf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apeldyn Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apeldyn Corporation
Represented By: Richard D. Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Electronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sony Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?