Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Arendi Holding Ltd. |
Microsoft Corporation and Dell Inc. |
1:2009cv00119 |
February 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Patent Office |
XX Outside US |
Unassigned Judge |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
35:271 Patent Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 195 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS found at 188 Report and Recommendations, and further Granting 132 Motion for Summary Judgment The Arendi Is Not Entitled To Provisional Damages Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. 154(D). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 4/12/2010. (nms) |
Filing 188 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT re 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment That Arendi Is Not Entitled To Provisional Damages Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. § 154(D), filed by Microsoft Corporation, Dell Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursua nt to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 4/8/2010. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/22/2010. (rpg) Modified on 3/23/2010 (nms). |
Filing 98 MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 53 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery Relating to Damages filed by Microsoft Corporation, Dell Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 10/27/2009. (nms) |
Filing 1 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.