XpertUniverse Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Plaintiff: XpertUniverse Inc.
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00157
Filed: March 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 773 MEMORANDUM addressing motion for a new trial and correcting an error. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/30/2014. (nms)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 768 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 662 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; 697 Motion for Enforcement of the Parties' Agreement to Limited Liability; 699 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, and Alternatively, for a New Trial and/or Remittitur Under Rule 59(a)(1); and 702 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment, and Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/20/2013. (nms)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 647 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in part 382 MOTION to Preclude the Expert Testimony of XpertUniverse's Retained Expert Walter Bratic. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/11/2013. (nms)
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 634 MEMORANDUM OPINION re Defendant's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (D.I. 297 , 300 , 303 , 306 , 311 , 315 , 318 , 320 , 327 , and 328 ). An Order will follow. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/8/2013. (nms)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 632 MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in part re 385 MOTION to Preclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. Illah R. Nourbakhsh (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/7/2013. (nms)
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 199 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 145 MOTION to Dismiss And Strike Certain Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses in Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/19/2012. (nms)
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 168 MEMORANDUM ORDER providing construction in the asserted claims of United States Patent Numbers 7,499,903 ("the '903 patent"), and 7,366,709 ("the '709 patent"). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/20/2012. (nms)
January 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 88 MOTION to Dismiss Certain Claims in Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Strike. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/20/2012. (nms)
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to stike D.I. 45 . An apprortiate Order will be entered.. Signed by Judge Joel A. Pisano on 3/28/2011. (dlk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XpertUniverse Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XpertUniverse Inc.
Represented By: Philip A. Rovner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?