Pronova BioPharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc.
| Pronova BioPharma Norge AS |
| Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. |
| 1:2009cv00286 |
| April 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
245
OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/29/2012. (fms)
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM ORDER re: evidentiary issues. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/24/2011. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00286-SLR -MPT, 1:09-cv-00304-SLR -MPT, 1:09-cv-00305-SLR -MPT(nmf)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pronva's motion for leave to file a surreply to defendants' motion to issue Letters of Request is GRANTED; and defendants' motion to issue Letters of Request for international judicial assistance pursuant to the Ha gue Evidence Convention is GRANTED. It is further ordered that defendants prepare and submit revised Letters of Request containing signature lines which reflect Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge's management of the discovery mattes in this case. Such revised Letters of Request will be issued and returned to the defendants' counsel for delivery to the proper authorities. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 4/27/2010. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00286-SLR-MPT, 1:09-cv-00304-SLR-MPT, 1:09-cv-00305-SLR-MPT(cak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
