Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
Plaintiff: Cephalon Inc. and Cephalon France
Defendant: Watson Laboratories Inc.
Counter Claimant: Watson Laboratories Inc.
Counter Defendant: Cephalon France and Cephalon Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00007
Filed: January 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 144 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re (123 in 1:10-cv-00007-GMS, 114 in 1:10-cv-00055-GMS, 51 in 1:11-cv-00782-GMS, 136 in 1:10-cv-00695-GMS, 115 in 1:10-cv-00210-GMS, 180 in 1:10-cv-01078-GMS, 300 in 1:10-md-02200-GMS) MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law < i>(Plaintiffs' Rule 52(c)) filed by Cephalon, Inc., Cephalon France, Cephalon Inc., (122 in 1:10-cv-00055-GMS, 59 in 1:11-cv-00782-GMS, 145 in 1:10-cv-00695-GMS, 123 in 1:10-cv-00210-GMS, 189 in 1:10-cv-01078-GMS, 314 in 1:10-md-02200- GMS, 131 in 1:10-cv-00007-GMS) POST Trial Brief filed by Cephalon, Inc., Cephalon France, Cephalon Inc., (319 in 1:10-md-02200-GMS, 128 in 1:10-cv-00210-GMS) Proposed Findings of Fact filed by Armodafinil Patent Litigation, Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lupin Limited. Signed by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 3/30/2013. Associated Cases: 1:10-md-02200-GMS et al.(asw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cephalon Inc. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Watson Laboratories Inc.
Represented By: John C. Phillips, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cephalon Inc.
Represented By: Mary W. Bourke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cephalon France
Represented By: Mary W. Bourke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Watson Laboratories Inc.
Represented By: John C. Phillips, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Cephalon France
Represented By: Mary W. Bourke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Cephalon Inc.
Represented By: Mary W. Bourke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?