Motorola Mobility Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
| Motorola Mobility Inc. |
| Apple Inc. and NeXT Software Inc. |
| 1:2010cv00867 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DECLARATION OF MAILING (as to service on defendants) by Motorola Mobility Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D)(Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 5,455,599; 5,519,867; 5,566,337; 5,915,131; 5,929,852; 5,946,647; 5,969,705; US 6,275,983 B1; US 6,343,263 B1; US 6,424,354 B1; US RE39,486 E; 5,481,721 (dmp, ) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 filed by Motorola Mobility Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Motorola Inc. for Motorola Mobility Inc.. (dmp, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (dmp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Apple Inc., NeXT Software Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 311-794112.) - filed by Motorola Mobility Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-6, # 2 Exhibit 7-12, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmp, ) |
| Summons Issued as to Apple Inc. on 10/12/2010; NeXT Software Inc. on 10/12/2010. (dmp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
