Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.

Plaintiff: Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Defendant: Genentech Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00156
Filed: February 18, 2011
Court: Delaware District Court
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Human Genome Sciences Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Human Genome Sciences Inc.
Represented By: Aimee H. Goldstein
Represented By: Harrison J. Frahn, IV
Represented By: Henry B. Gutman
Represented By: Katherine A. Helm
Represented By: Timothy A. Key
Represented By: Noah M. Leibowitz
Represented By: Michael R. Lizano
Represented By: Serena M. Orloff
Represented By: Arman Y. Oruc
Represented By: Adam Wyatt Poff
Represented By: Jonathan C. Sanders
Represented By: Monte Terrell Squire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genentech Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth A. Gallo
Represented By: Philip A. Rovner
Represented By: Eric A. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.