HSM Portfolio LLC et al v. Fujitsu Limited et al
| HSM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC |
| Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Qualcomm Inc, Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Ltd., Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Promos Technologies Inc., Sandisk Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, STMicroelectronics, N.V., STMicroelectronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Cirrus Logic, Inc., ON Semiconductor Corporation, Xilinx Inc. and Zoran Corporation |
| 1:2011cv00770 |
| September 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Stewart Dalzell |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1237
MEMORANDUM ORDER resolving issues that have arisen on the eve of trial (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/19/2016. (nms)
|
|
Filing
1207
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Dismissing as Moot 1091 MOTION to Strike Untimely Evidence Cited In Micron's Summary Judgment Brief, Dismissing as Moot 1125 MOTION to Strike Untimely Evidence Cited in Micron's Summary Judgment Opposition Brief , Dismissing as Moot (pertaining to the A35A Design ID)and Denying (with respect to the Flannagan and Annaratone prior art references) 995 MOTION to Preclude Untimely Prior Art Evidence from Trial, and Granting (with respect to the new infringemen t theory for the '949 patent raised in Dr. Foty's reply infringement report), Dismissing as Moot (pertaining to Dr. Forty's analysis for literal infringement of the '212 patent), and Denying (with respect to the doctrine of equivalents infringement theory for the '212 patent) 1049 MOTION to Strike Untimely Opinions of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/11/2016. (ksr, )
|
|
Filing
951
ORDER ADOPTING 860 Report and Recommendations. The Motion to Compel (D.I. 828 ) is RESOLVED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/5/2014. (nms)
|
|
Filing
860
RECOMMENDATION and Order re 828 MOTION to Compel Full and Complete Discovery Responses and Documents From. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 10/14/2014. Signed by Special Discovery Master B. Wilson Redfearn on 9/26/2014. (nms)
|
|
Filing
854
AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 717 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C) (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/9/2014. (nms) Modified on 9/9/2014 (nms).
|
|
Filing
824
MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 750 MOTION for Reconsideration re 715 Memorandum Opinion, filed by HSM Portfolio LLC, Technology Properties Limited LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/12/2014. (nms)
|
|
Filing
715
MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction regarding the eleven disputed terms found in U.S. Patent No. 5,030,853, U.S. Patent No. 5,391,949, U.S. Patent No. 5,247,212, and U.S. Patent No. 5,001,367. Within five days the parties should submit a proposed order, consistent with this opinion, suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/17/2014. (nms)
|
|
Filing
487
MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding amendments to the scheduling order. The parties shall promptly submit an additional scheduling order with all of the pretrial and trial dates (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/4/2013. (nms)
|
|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 45 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part 52 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 70 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 100 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 122 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part [ 139]; Administratively closing with leave to renew 140 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part 174 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted Leave to Amend its complaint no later than 7/17/2012 (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/3/2012. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
