M2M Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America Inc. et al
Plaintiff: M2M Solutions LLC
Defendant: Sierra Wireless America Inc. and Sierra Wireless Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00030
Filed: January 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 224 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding summary judgment motions (see D.I. 181 and 185 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/31/2016. (nms)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 215 MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding MOTIONS for Reconsideration (180 in 12-cv-30-RGA, 164 in 12-cv-33-RGA, 139 in 12-cv-32-RGA). The term "a programmable interface" is construed to mean "an interface that is able to be directly programmed." The term "processing module" is construed to mean "components or units of a computer program." Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/2/2015. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00030-RGA, 1:12-cv-00032-RGA, 1:12-cv-00033-RGA(nms)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying (140 in 12-cv-00030-RGA) Motion to Stay Case Until Resolution of Related Co-Pending Cases; GRANTING (147 in 12-cv-00030-RGA) MOTION to Re-Coordinate Scheduling Order Deadlines; DISMISSING (149 in 12-cv-00030-RGA) MOTION to Fi le Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion to Stay the Case; DENYING (143 in 12-cv-00033-RGA) MOTION for Entry of Final Judgment; DENYING (144 in 12-cv-00033-RGA) Motion to Stay Case; and DENYING (113 in 12-cv-00034-RGA) MOTION to Stay Case. The parties shall submit a status report within two weeks. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/20/2014. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00030-RGA, 1:12-cv-00032-RGA, 1:12-cv-00033-RGA, 1:12-cv-00034-RGA(nms)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the claim construction of various disputed terms found in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,049,010, and 7,583,197. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/12/2013. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00030-RGA, 1:12-cv-00031-RGA, 1:12-cv-00032-RGA, 1:12-cv-00033-RGA, 1:12-cv-00034-RGA(nms)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: M2M Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M2M Solutions LLC
Represented By: Stephen B. Brauerman
Represented By: Richard D. Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sierra Wireless America Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sierra Wireless Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?