Abbott Laboratories v. Roxane Laboratories Inc.
| Abbott Laboratories |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc. |
| Abbott Laboratories |
| Roxane Laboratories Inc. |
| 1:2012cv00457 |
| April 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard G. Andrews |
| Christopher J. Burke |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending GRANTING D.I. 34 MOTION to Substitute Party: AbbVie Inc. to replace Abbott Laboratories filed by Abbott Laboratories, GRANTING D.I. 13 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Southern District of Ohio file d by Roxane Laboratories Inc., DENYING D.I. 24 MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice All Claims and Counterclaims Directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,148,359 B2 and 7,364,752 B1 filed by Abbott Laboratories, and DENYING 32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter filed by Roxane Laboratories Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longe r than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/2013. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/28/2013. (dlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
