Advanced Optical Tracking LLC v. Royal Philips Electronics N.V., et al.
| Advanced Optical Tracking LLC |
| Royal Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corp. |
| 1:2012cv01292 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Leonard P. Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Denying 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/13. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending DENIAL of D.I. 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Philips Electronics North America Corp., Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.. Please note that when filing Objectio ns pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/26/2013. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/9/2013. (dlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
