Kabbaj v. Simpson
||Mark Sutherland Simpson
||October 16, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Delaware
||XX US, Outside State
||Mary Pat Thynge
|Nature of Suit:
||Assault Libel & Slander
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 18, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court denies plaintiffs Motion to Recuse and Amended Motions to Recuse United States Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455 in C. A. No. 10-431-RGA at D.I. 74, 75, and further denies as the motions found in C. A. Nos. 13-1522-RGA at D.I. 118, 119; 14-780-RGA at D.I. 5, 16, 17; 14-982-RGA at D.I. 7, 8; 14-1001-RGA at D.I. 24, 29 are moot. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 12/18/14. (cak)
|June 6, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Mark Sutherland Simpson. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the O bjections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2013. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 6/6/13. (cak)
|April 8, 2013
MEMORANDUM ORDER Overruling 43 Objections, and ADOPTING 42 Memorandum and Order. The Motion to Compel Disclosures (D.I. 14 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion to amend the amended complaint is DENIED; Defendant's motion to strike Plainti ff's motion to amend the amended complaint (D.I. 29 ) is Dismissed as Moot; and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (D.I. 46 ) is DENIED (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/8/2013. (nms)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?