Nexans Inc. et al v. Belden Inc. et al
| Nexans Inc. |
| Belden Inc. and Belden Technologies Inc. |
| 1:2012cv01491 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 103 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Berk-Tek LLC, Nexans Inc. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/26/2017. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 71 denying 47 Motion to Stay without prejudice to renew pending completion of IPR. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/12/2014. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
71
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- DENYING 47 MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Inter Partes Reviews. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no lon ger than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/10/2014. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 2/19/2014. (lih)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/6/2013. (nmfn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
