MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Plaintiff: MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC
Defendant: Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00303
Filed: February 25, 2013
Court: Delaware District Court
Office: Wilmington Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 30, 2015 102 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/30/15. Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-00303-LPS, 1:13-cv-00304-LPS, 1:13-cv-00305-LPS (ntl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAZ Encryption Technologies LLC
Represented By: Stephen B. Brauerman
Represented By: Richard D. Kirk
Represented By: Vanessa Ribeiro Tiradentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?