GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Plaintiff: GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Limited
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00878
Filed: July 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 489 MEMORANDUM OPINION re pending motions. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/28/18. (ntl)
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 456 LETTER OPINION re 455 . An Oral Argument is set for 10/26/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6B before Judge Leonard P. Stark. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/27/2017. (etg)
May 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 379 MEMORANDUM ORDER re decisions on various motions in limine and other pretrial issues. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/25/17. (ntl)
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 328 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 191 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED -- 63 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/20/17. (ntl)
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 191 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending DENYING D.I. 63 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [DEFENDANT TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM] filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/8/2016. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/20/2016. (mlc)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 125 MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding D.I. 113 Joint MOTION for Hearing re Oral Order,,,,, For Conference to Resolve Discovery Dispute filed by GlaxoSmithKline LLC, SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Limited. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 03/03/2016. (mlc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Represented By: William Chad Shear
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Limited
Represented By: William Chad Shear
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Represented By: Timothy J. Doyle
Represented By: Jennifer L. Ford
Represented By: Robert Frederickson, III.
Represented By: Ira J. Levy
Represented By: John W. Shaw
Represented By: Daryl L. Wiesen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?