TQ Delta LLC v. ADTRAN Inc.
TQ Delta LLC |
ADTRAN Inc. |
ADTRAN Inc. |
TQ Delta LLC |
1:2014cv00954 |
July 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
New Castle |
Richard G. Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1466 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/18/2023. (nms) |
Filing 1368 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/23/2021. (nms) |
Filing 1366 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/17/2021. (nms) |
Filing 1321 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/30/2021. (nms) |
Filing 1186 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendant's motion to strike (D.I. 962 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion to strike (D.I. 1018 ) is DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/31/2020. (nms) |
Filing 1181 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/28/2020. (nms) |
Filing 1110 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/9/2020. (nms) |
Filing 915 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony Inconsistent with the Court's Claim Construction for Family 10 (D.I. 727 in C.A. 14-954-RGA) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/31/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 870 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Motion for Reargument and Claim Construction in Light of the Court's Opinion on ADTRAN's Motion for Claim Construction and Summary Judgment on the 956 and 411 Patents (D.I. 831 in C.A. 14-954-RGA) is DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/4/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 865 MEMORANDUM ORDER: ADTRAN's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration (D.I. 794 in 14-cv-954-RGA; D.I. 791 in 15-cv-121-RGA) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/3/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 811 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/13/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 809 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/12/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 804 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/11/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 800 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/9/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) (Main Document 800 replaced on 9/10/2019) (nms). |
Filing 762 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/15/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 674 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/23/2019. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 398 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment on the License Issue. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/18/2018. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Filing 375 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the issue of claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,625,660. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/27/2018. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-00954-RGA, 1:15-cv-00121-RGA(nms) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.