International Construction Products LLC v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
Plaintiff: International Construction Products LLC
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc., Komatsu America Corp., Volvo Construction Equipment North America LLC and Associated Auction Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv00108
Filed: January 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Andrews
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15:1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 238 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Motions to Dismiss. An appropriate order was entered on September 30, 2019 (D.I. 237 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/10/2019. (nms)
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 160 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/26/2018. (nms)
August 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Motion for Reconsideration and for Leave to Amend (D.I. 49 , and Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 54 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/22/2016. (nms)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Motions to Dismiss (D.I. 27 , 28 , 30 , 33 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/21/2016. (nms)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: International Construction Products LLC v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Construction Products LLC
Represented By: James P. Denvir
Represented By: Christopher G. Renner
Represented By: John W. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar Inc.
Represented By: David J. Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Komatsu America Corp.
Represented By: David H Bamberger
Represented By: Laura D. Hatcher
Represented By: Denise Seastone Kraft
Represented By: James F Reardon
Represented By: Katherine M Ruffing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Volvo Construction Equipment North America LLC
Represented By: M. Duncan Grant
Represented By: James Harry Stone Levine
Represented By: Robin Sumner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Associated Auction Services LLC
Represented By: Edward F. Eaton
Represented By: Kelly W. Hoversten
Represented By: Quentin R. Wittrock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?