Gimaex Holding Inc. v. Spartan Motors USA Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Gimaex Holding Inc
Defendant: Spartan Motors USA Inc. and Spartan-Gimaex Innovations LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv00515
Filed: June 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Andrews
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER ADOPTING 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 58 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/17/2016. (nms)
July 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 58 Granting In part and Denying In Part the MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gimaex Holding Inc. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/15/2016. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/28/16. (kjk)
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Objections to 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/22/2015. (nms)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 2 MOTION to Expedite filed by Gimaex Holding Inc. IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Gimaexs motion for expedited proceedings for Count I of the complaint (D.I. 2) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 10/30/15. (cak)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter filed by Spartan Motors USA Inc. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists sole ly of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 11/2/2015. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 10/14/15. (cak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gimaex Holding Inc. v. Spartan Motors USA Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gimaex Holding Inc
Represented By: Diana Rabeh
Represented By: Brian M. Rostocki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spartan Motors USA Inc.
Represented By: Michael F. Bonkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spartan-Gimaex Innovations LLC
Represented By: Michael F. Bonkowski
Represented By: Nicholas Jaison Brannick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?