Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited et al
| Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 |
| TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, TCT Mobile Limited, and TCT Mobile (US), Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00634 |
| July 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
595
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendants motion for a continued stay of this action (D.I. 577 ) is denied as moot. Defendants letter request for a further stay pending administrative proceedings (D.I. 593 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 7/8/2021. (cna, )
|
|
Filing
565
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Joint Motion (D.I. 562 ) is GRANTED. Any publicly available copies of the transcripts of Trial Days 2-7 (D.I. 552-557), including, but not limited to, transcripts that will be available by remote electronic access, shall be redacted consistent with the proposed Exhibits A-F to the Joint Motion. The original unredacted transcripts (D.I. 552-557) shall remain sealed. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 12/3/2019. (amf)
|
|
Filing
532
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law (D.I. 502 ) is DENIED. A final judgment on the verdict will be entered (*see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 4/24/2019. (ceg)
|
|
Filing
377
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 360 ; denying as moot 260 Motion to Dismiss ; denying as moot 275 Motion for Leave to File; granting 236 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 3/8/2018. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
234
MEMORANDUM ORDER re: claim construction. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 4/19/2017. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 194 ; granting 74 Motion to Dismiss. TCT Mobile (US), Inc. and TCT Mobile, Inc. may amend their counterclaims within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 3/20/2017. (nmfn)
|
|
Filing
194
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 74 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) - Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of Defendants TCT Mobile (US), Inc. and TCT Mob ile, Inc. filed by Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2017. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 2/27/17. (cak)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 17 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 9/29/2016. (nmfn) (Main Document 103 replaced on 9/29/2016) (nmfn, ).
|
|
Filing
72
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- denying 17 MOTION to Dismiss. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/6/2016. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 8/17/2016. (lih)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
