Hospira Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Plaintiff: Hospira Inc.
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Counter_claimant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Counter_defendant: Hospira Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv00697
Filed: August 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Defendant has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the asserted claims of the '158, '470, and '527 patents are invalid. Defendant has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, however, that the asser ted claim of the '106 patent is invalid. Plaintiff has proven that Defendant infringes the asserted claims of the '158, '470, and '527 patents as a matter of fact, and that Defendant infringes the asserted claim of the '106 patent as a matter of law. Plaintiff should submit an agreed upon form of final judgment within two weeks. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/22/2018. (nms)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM ORDER providing claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,242,158, 8,338,470, 8,455,527, and 8,648,106 (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/24/2016. (nms)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hospira Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hospira Inc.
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Represented By: Yusuf Esat
Represented By: Sara Tonnies Horton
Represented By: Bradford P. Lyerla
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Newell
Represented By: Michael T. Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Represented By: Kelly E. Farnan
Represented By: Alton L. Hare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Represented By: Kelly E. Farnan
Represented By: Alton L. Hare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Hospira Inc.
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Represented By: Yusuf Esat
Represented By: Sara Tonnies Horton
Represented By: Bradford P. Lyerla
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Newell
Represented By: Michael T. Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?