Adkins et al v. Reynolds et al
| Tyrone M. Adkins, Sherre Addussalaam, Rashell Thompson and Nathan Thompson |
| Dallas Reynolds, Dannaile Rementer, Governer Tasc Force and Tactical Unit (SERT) team |
| 1:2015cv00882 |
| October 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Sussex |
| Gregory M. Sleet |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff's request for counsel (D.I. 90 ) is DENIED without prejudice (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/18/2020. (nms)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The motion to compel (D.I. 62 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff shall respond to Interrogatories Nos. 7, 8, and 10, and Production Request Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 on or before August 7, 2020. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplementary evidence for discovery (D.I. 74 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/23/2020. (crb) Modified on 7/23/2020 (nms).
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 36 MOTION for Extension of Time to filed by Tyrone M. Adkins is GRANTED. The plaintiff may file a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit within fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 11/15/17. (sar)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 8/31/2017. (nmfn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
