In re: Culp et al v. Stanziale
| Mark A. Culp and Patricia J. Chamberlain |
| Mark A. Culp and Patricia J. Chamberlain |
| Charles A Stanziale, Jr |
| 1:2015cv00914 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Leonard P. Stark |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM ORDER: the Bankruptcy Court's Conversion Order is AFFIRMED and the appeal of the Sale Order is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/5/16. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00914-LPS, 1:15-cv-00916-LPS, 1:15-cv-00917-LPS (ntl)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM ORDER re (5 in 1:15-cv-00914-LPS) (5 in 1:15-cv-00916-LPS) (5 in 1:15-cv-00917-LPS) MOTION to Stay is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/17/15. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00914-LPS, 1:15-cv-00916-LPS, 1:15-cv-00917-LPS (ntl)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Recommendation issued October 26, 2015 is modified in that the recommendation that Appellants request for thirty (30) days in which to file their opening brief is withdrawn, and no Recommendation is made regarding a briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 10/30/15. (cak)
|
|
Filing
4
Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withrawn from mandatory mediation. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 10/26/15. (cak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
