Nexeon Limited v. EaglePicher Technologies LLC et al
Nexeon Limited |
EaglePicher Technologies LLC and OneD Material LLC |
1:2015cv00955 |
October 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX Outside US |
Richard G. Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 174 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding claim construction of multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,940,437, 8,597,831, and 9,583,762. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/25/2018. (nms) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Objections at D.I. 19 are OVERRULED. The conclusions of the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 18 ) are ADOPTED. The motion to dismiss (D.I. 13 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/18/2016. (nms) |
Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by OneD Material LLC, EaglePicher Technologies LLC. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Obje ctions (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/12/2016. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 7/26/16. (kjk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.