Indivior Inc. et al v. Mylan Technologies Inc. et al
Indivior Inc., Indivior UK Limited and MonoSol Rx LLC |
Mylan Technologies Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan N.V. |
1:2015cv01016 |
November 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard G. Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 329 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/23/2020. (nms) |
Filing 283 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Plaintiffs have not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Alvogen infringes the asserted claims of the '497 and '514 patents. Plaintiffs should submit an agreed up form of final judgment with two weeks. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/22/2018. (nms) |
Filing 233 MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 175 MOTION to Strike New Infringement Theory Offered By Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Dr. Robert Prud'Homme In His Reply Report. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/22/2017. (nms) |
Filing 171 MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying request to renew motion to dismiss (D.I. 154 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/28/2017. (nms) |
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction for multiple terms in dispute in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,603,514, 8,475,832, 8,017,150, and 8,900,497. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/12/2017. (nms) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.