Crystallex International Corp. v. Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. et al
Crystallex International Corp. |
Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A., PDV Holding, Inc. and CITGO Holding, Inc. |
1:2015cv01082 |
November 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX Outside US |
Leonard P. Stark |
Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding pending motions and stay. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/12/19. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-01082-LPS et al. (ntl) |
Filing 114 MEMORANDUM ORDER setting deadline to file joint status report and cancelling the December 20, 2018 hearing. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/30/18. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-01082-LPS, 1:16-cv-00904-LPS, 1:16-cv-01007-LPS, 1:17-cv-00028-LPS (ntl) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 28 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 5/1/17. (ntl) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 41 REQUEST for Certification of Direct Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit filed by CITGO Holding, Inc., PDV Holding, Inc., Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. The Court's 09/30/16 Order (D.I. 35 ) is AMENDED. Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report no later than January 4, 2017. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/27/16. (etg) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 8 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/16. (ntl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.