Genzyme Corporation et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Defendant: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Counter_claimant: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Counter_defendant: Genzyme Corporation and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv00540
Filed: June 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Gregory M. Sleet
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genzyme Corporation et al v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation
Represented By: Alison J. Baldwin
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Bove
Represented By: Paula S. Fritsch
Represented By: Jeremy E. Noe
Represented By: Karen Riesenburger Poppel
Represented By: Kurt W. Rohde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Represented By: Alison J. Baldwin
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Bove
Represented By: Paula S. Fritsch
Represented By: Jeremy E. Noe
Represented By: Karen Riesenburger Poppel
Represented By: Kurt W. Rohde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Dominick T. Gattuso
Represented By: Chad A. Landmon
Represented By: David K. Ludwig
Represented By: Edward M. Mathias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Dominick T. Gattuso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Genzyme Corporation
Represented By: Alison J. Baldwin
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Bove
Represented By: Paula S. Fritsch
Represented By: Jeremy E. Noe
Represented By: Karen Riesenburger Poppel
Represented By: Kurt W. Rohde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Represented By: Alison J. Baldwin
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Bove
Represented By: Paula S. Fritsch
Represented By: Jeremy E. Noe
Represented By: Karen Riesenburger Poppel
Represented By: Kurt W. Rohde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?